You honestly won't care if you use Flash, Edge Animate, a framework or hand code things in Dreamweaver yourself. JavaScript, CSS3 and Canvas is the ultimate combination.Īfter a working knowledge of them you'll see the road a bit more clearly. Adobe edge animate cc xforce professional#There's plenty of times you can simply apply a style to an object and get a rather complex, professional effect, with no code, silky smooth on the GPU. It's just not possible or practical.Ī good solid understanding of the various CSS3 transforms and animation will be extremely useful because they are already typically GPU accelerated. It's like trying to get professional results out of a watered down Flash, minus ActionScript. Without knowing it, you'd be entirely limited to the IDE's built in capabilities. While large single page applications doesn't really seem to be the concern here, JavaScript's objects and encapsulation (scope) must be fully understood to really get anywhere, regardless what tool you use. That flex comes with the responsibility of using it correctly. This language is often thought to be simple but the more you learn about prototypical programming the more you'll learn to respect the flexibility of it. I would honestly say that learning JavaScript should be your first move. Whatever the reason, I'm now investing time in Flash HTML5 content over Edge. On the other hand, even the GitReader app on iPad won't interact with the Edge animation within an iFrame.But it will with Flash & Captivate HTML output.Ĭould it be that Edge uses its own library of Edge JS, whereas the libraries used by Flash Captivate (CreateJS) are supported by iOS? (I'm not into coding - but the Adobe guy in the other forum alluded to as much.) On the one hand, iBooks may have a problem with content in iFrames. I need as many JavaScript hints as possible!).īut now I'm looking at the area of ebooks and there are problems with Edge animations on iPads, even though they are indeed HTML5. Until recently, I assumed there was no real difference other than the interface (I prefer the Edge layout - it's closer to video editing - but wish they would undo the changes made to the code editor since CC 2014. Re the topic of this discussion - I'd been wondering the same thing. Finally we can't expect a tool to do all the magics, rather the dev team have to code something! The team just need HTML5 responsive content that may includes animations. Don't want to miss the advantages one has on another. As all the tools comes from single Vendor, tends to think they can be grouped in a single IDE. Here comparing tools that can provides similar/relative outputs from a single Vendor. Choose one Dev env and stick with that is a general use case when others provide similar outputs. However I don't see anybody works with all in this case Eclipse, Netbeans, IntelliJ for day to day development works. Obviously one has advantage on another based on the different needs. On initial days on Java development, compared different vendors Eclipse, Netbeans, IntelliJ for the IDE support. One eclipse environment can be used for AS, PHP, JS, JAVA, CSS. Adobe edge animate cc xforce apk#Whether it is for SWF, EXE, DMG, IPA, or APK I use the utilities from my familiar Flash IDE environment. If device support is the only concern to lead for combo, flash CC IDE can be used to generate different kind of out puts for multi device compatibility when it comes to executable. Probably that may be the best from the available on this scenario. Your recommendation is to use combo on this, okay then. I can't take SWF as requires device support for mobile users.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |